2000 Chrysler 300 vs. 2010 Holden Cruze

To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler 300 (253 HP) has 114 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (139 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.

Because 2000 Chrysler 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chrysler 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler 300 (479 Nm) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (176 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze. 2000 Chrysler 300 has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden Cruze has manual transmission. 2010 Holden Cruze will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler 300 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: