2000 Chrysler 300 vs. 2010 Jaguar XF

To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler 300. (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XF weights approximately 213 kg more than 2000 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler 300 (479 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Jaguar XF. (420 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Jaguar XF.

Compare all specifications: