2000 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2008 Smart Ultimate 112
To start off, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Concorde (200 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. (110 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112.
Because 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler Concorde (258 Nm @ 4850 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. (151 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2000 Chrysler Concorde will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Concorde | 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Smart |
| Model | Concorde | Ultimate 112 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 151 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4850 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1570 mm |
