2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1946 Rover P2
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Rover P2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Rover P2 would be higher. At 1,577 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Rover P2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1946 Rover P2. (47 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 should accelerate faster than 1946 Rover P2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 200 kg more than 1946 Rover P2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1946 Rover P2 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Rover |
| Model | ESX 3 | P2 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1946 |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1577 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1420 kg |
