2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1951 Toyota SA
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Toyota SA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Toyota SA would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1951 Toyota SA. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 should accelerate faster than 1951 Toyota SA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 450 kg more than 1951 Toyota SA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1951 Toyota SA | |
| Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
| Model | ESX 3 | SA |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2410 mm |
