2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1952 Mercedes-Benz 300
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1952 Mercedes-Benz 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Mercedes-Benz 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1952 Mercedes-Benz 300 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | ESX 3 | 300 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2390 mm |
