2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1954 Hudson Italia Coupe
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Hudson Italia Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Hudson Italia Coupe would be higher. At 3,303 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Hudson Italia Coupe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Hudson Italia Coupe (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Hudson Italia Coupe should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3.
Because 1954 Hudson Italia Coupe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Hudson Italia Coupe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Hudson Italia Coupe. (214 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Hudson Italia Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1954 Hudson Italia Coupe | |
Make | Chrysler | Hudson |
Model | ESX 3 | Italia Coupe |
Year Released | 2000 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 3303 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 214 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2670 mm |