2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1955 Trabant P 70
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Trabant P 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Trabant P 70 would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1955 Trabant P 70. (22 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 should accelerate faster than 1955 Trabant P 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 770 kg more than 1955 Trabant P 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Trabant P 70. (54 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Trabant P 70.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1955 Trabant P 70 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Trabant |
| Model | ESX 3 | P 70 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1955 |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 22 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 332 Nm | 54 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1510 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2390 mm |
