2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1961 DKW Munga
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 504 kg more than 1961 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1961 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chrysler | DKW |
Model | ESX 3 | Munga |
Year Released | 2000 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2010 mm |