2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1961 Lotus Elite
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Lotus Elite (83 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Lotus Elite should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 1040 kg more than 1961 Lotus Elite.
Because 1961 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1961 Lotus Elite | |
| Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
| Model | ESX 3 | Elite |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1961 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1216 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2240 mm |
