2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1964 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 765 kg more than 1964 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1964 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Chrysler | Zastava |
| Model | ESX 3 | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2010 mm |
