2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1968 DAF 44
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 DAF 44 would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1968 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 should accelerate faster than 1968 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 865 kg more than 1968 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 DAF 44. (65 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1968 DAF 44 | |
Make | Chrysler | DAF |
Model | ESX 3 | 44 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 844 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 65 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 755 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2260 mm |