2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1971 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 1,990 cc, 1971 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 NSU Ro 80 (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1971 NSU Ro 80.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 NSU Ro 80. (188 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1971 NSU Ro 80 | |
Make | Chrysler | NSU |
Model | ESX 3 | Ro 80 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1971 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1990 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 188 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2870 mm |