2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1974 TVR M
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 TVR M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 TVR M would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 TVR M is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 725 kg more than 1974 TVR M.
Because 1974 TVR M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 TVR M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 has automatic transmission and 1974 TVR M has manual transmission. 1974 TVR M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1974 TVR M | |
| Make | Chrysler | TVR |
| Model | ESX 3 | M |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 895 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2290 mm |
