2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1976 Maserati Khamsin
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Maserati Khamsin. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Maserati Khamsin would be higher. At 4,899 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Maserati Khamsin is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Maserati Khamsin weights approximately 60 kg more than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3.
Because 1976 Maserati Khamsin is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Maserati Khamsin. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 has automatic transmission and 1976 Maserati Khamsin has manual transmission. 1976 Maserati Khamsin will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1976 Maserati Khamsin | |
Make | Chrysler | Maserati |
Model | ESX 3 | Khamsin |
Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 4899 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2560 mm |