2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Monteverdi Sahara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Monteverdi Sahara would be higher. At 3,253 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Monteverdi Sahara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara (81 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1978 Monteverdi Sahara | |
| Make | Chrysler | Monteverdi |
| Model | ESX 3 | Sahara |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 3253 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2550 mm |
