2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1981 Opel Ascona
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Opel Ascona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1981 Opel Ascona. (53 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 should accelerate faster than 1981 Opel Ascona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 600 kg more than 1981 Opel Ascona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Opel Ascona. (98 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1981 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Chrysler | Opel |
Model | ESX 3 | Ascona |
Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 98 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2580 mm |