2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1982 Suzuki SJ 410

To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Suzuki SJ 410. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Suzuki SJ 410 would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1982 Suzuki SJ 410. (44 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Suzuki SJ 410. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 750 kg more than 1982 Suzuki SJ 410. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Suzuki SJ 410 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Suzuki SJ 410 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Suzuki SJ 410. (74 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Suzuki SJ 410.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chrysler ESX 3 1982 Suzuki SJ 410
Make Chrysler Suzuki
Model ESX 3 SJ 410
Year Released 2000 1982
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1499 cc 970 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 74 HP 44 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 332 Nm 74 Nm
Drive Type Front 4WD
Vehicle Weight 1620 kg 870 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 3450 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1470 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 3000 mm 2040 mm