2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1983 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (81 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 700 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1983 Fiat Ritmo | |
| Make | Chrysler | Fiat |
| Model | ESX 3 | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 81 HP |
| Torque | 332 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2450 mm |
