2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1983 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1983 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Toyota Celica (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 440 kg more than 1983 Toyota Celica.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1983 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
| Model | ESX 3 | Celica |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 332 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2640 mm |
