2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,331 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass (158 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 305 kg more than 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (252 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
Model | ESX 3 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2000 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 3331 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 252 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1315 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2640 mm |