2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1989 Lotus Carlton
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Lotus Carlton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Lotus Carlton would be higher. At 3,615 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Lotus Carlton is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Lotus Carlton is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Lotus Carlton. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Lotus Carlton (569 Nm) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (332 Nm). This means 1989 Lotus Carlton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 has automatic transmission and 1989 Lotus Carlton has manual transmission. 1989 Lotus Carlton will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1989 Lotus Carlton | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | ESX 3 | Carlton |
Year Released | 2000 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 3615 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 332 Nm | 569 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2750 mm |