2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1990 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Mitsubishi Magna (114 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Mitsubishi Magna should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 285 kg more than 1990 Mitsubishi Magna.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Mitsubishi Magna. (198 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Mitsubishi Magna.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1990 Mitsubishi Magna | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | ESX 3 | Magna |
Year Released | 2000 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 198 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2730 mm |