2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1992 Nissan 100 NX
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Nissan 100 NX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Nissan 100 NX would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Nissan 100 NX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Nissan 100 NX (141 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Nissan 100 NX should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 480 kg more than 1992 Nissan 100 NX.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Nissan 100 NX. (182 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Nissan 100 NX.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1992 Nissan 100 NX | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | ESX 3 | 100 NX |
Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 182 Nm |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1320 mm |