2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1992 Toyota Lite Ace

To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 520 kg more than 1992 Toyota Lite Ace.

Because 1992 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 has automatic transmission and 1992 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1992 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: