2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1994 Chrysler ES
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Chrysler ES (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 475 kg more than 1994 Chrysler ES.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1994 Chrysler ES | |
| Make | Chrysler | Chrysler |
| Model | ESX 3 | ES |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2213 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 332 Nm | 166 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1145 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2470 mm |
