2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1994 Rover 200
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,905 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (66 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1994 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (123 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1994 Rover 200 | |
Make | Chrysler | Rover |
Model | ESX 3 | 200 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1905 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 123 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |