2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1995 Marcos Mantara
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Marcos Mantara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Marcos Mantara would be higher. At 3,950 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Marcos Mantara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Marcos Mantara (182 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Marcos Mantara should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 690 kg more than 1995 Marcos Mantara.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Marcos Mantara. (313 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Marcos Mantara.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1995 Marcos Mantara | |
| Make | Chrysler | Marcos |
| Model | ESX 3 | Mantara |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 182 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Torque | 332 Nm | 313 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1090 mm |
