2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 310 kg more than 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1996 Oldsmobile Achieva | |
Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
Model | ESX 3 | Achieva |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1750 mm |