2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1996 Toyota Conquest
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota Conquest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota Conquest would be higher. At 1,973 cc, 1996 Toyota Conquest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota Conquest (174 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Conquest should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 504 kg more than 1996 Toyota Conquest.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Toyota Conquest. (135 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Toyota Conquest.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1996 Toyota Conquest | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | ESX 3 | Conquest |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1973 cc |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 174 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 135 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1116 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2740 mm |