2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1997 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Windstar (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Windstar weights approximately 70 kg more than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1997 Ford Windstar | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | ESX 3 | Windstar |
Year Released | 2000 | 1997 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1920 mm |