2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1998 Honda Integra
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Honda Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Honda Integra would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Honda Integra (197 HP) has 123 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 421 kg more than 1998 Honda Integra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 has automatic transmission and 1998 Honda Integra has manual transmission. 1998 Honda Integra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1998 Honda Integra | |
| Make | Chrysler | Honda |
| Model | ESX 3 | Integra |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 197 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1199 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2570 mm |
