2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1998 Peugeot Tulip
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Peugeot Tulip. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Peugeot Tulip would be higher. At 1,996 cc, 1998 Peugeot Tulip is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Peugeot Tulip (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Peugeot Tulip should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 740 kg more than 1998 Peugeot Tulip.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. (205 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Peugeot Tulip.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1998 Peugeot Tulip | |
| Make | Chrysler | Peugeot |
| Model | ESX 3 | Tulip |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 332 Nm | 205 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 880 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2390 mm |
