2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 1999 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Scenic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Scenic would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Renault Scenic (136 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 225 kg more than 1999 Renault Scenic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Scenic. (188 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 1999 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | ESX 3 | Scenic |
Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 188 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2570 mm |