2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 2000 Ford TL-50
To start off, both 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 and 2000 Ford TL-50 were released in the same year (2000). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 1,798 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TL-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TL-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TL-50 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 318 kg more than 2000 Ford TL-50.
Because 2000 Ford TL-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TL-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (332 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 2000 Ford TL-50 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | ESX 3 | TL-50 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 332 Nm | 570 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1302 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2760 mm |
