2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 2001 Nissan MM
To start off, 2001 Nissan MM is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 would be higher. At 2,956 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan MM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan MM (153 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan MM should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan MM weights approximately 215 kg more than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan MM (372 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (332 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan MM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 2001 Nissan MM | |
| Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
| Model | ESX 3 | MM |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 332 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1835 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 1530 mm |
