2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 2001 Suzuki Covie
To start off, 2001 Suzuki Covie is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2001 Suzuki Covie. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Suzuki Covie. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 870 kg more than 2001 Suzuki Covie. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Suzuki Covie. (178 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Suzuki Covie.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 2001 Suzuki Covie | |
Make | Chrysler | Suzuki |
Model | ESX 3 | Covie |
Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1327 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 2950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2010 mm |