2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 2002 Xedos 9
To start off, 2002 Xedos 9 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Xedos 9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Xedos 9 (161 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Xedos 9 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 35 kg more than 2002 Xedos 9.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Xedos 9. (212 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Xedos 9.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 2002 Xedos 9 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Xedos |
| Model | ESX 3 | 9 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 332 Nm | 212 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2760 mm |
