2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 2003 Renault Megane

To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (134 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 190 kg more than 2003 Renault Megane.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Megane. (188 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Megane.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chrysler ESX 3 2003 Renault Megane
Make Chrysler Renault
Model ESX 3 Megane
Year Released 2000 2003
Body Type Sedan Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1499 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 74 HP 134 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 332 Nm 188 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1620 kg 1430 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4360 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 3000 mm 2620 mm