2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 2003 Subaru Baja
To start off, 2003 Subaru Baja is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Subaru Baja is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Subaru Baja (164 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Subaru Baja should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 40 kg more than 2003 Subaru Baja.
Because 2003 Subaru Baja is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru Baja will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru Baja. (225 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru Baja.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 2003 Subaru Baja | |
Make | Chrysler | Subaru |
Model | ESX 3 | Baja |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 164 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 225 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2660 mm |