2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 2004 Ford Freestar

To start off, 2004 Ford Freestar is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 would be higher. At 3,802 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Freestar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Freestar (193 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Freestar should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Freestar weights approximately 319 kg more than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Freestar. (325 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Freestar.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chrysler ESX 3 2004 Ford Freestar
Make Chrysler Ford
Model ESX 3 Freestar
Year Released 2000 2004
Body Type Sedan Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1499 cc 3802 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 74 HP 193 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 332 Nm 325 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1620 kg 1939 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 5110 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1950 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 3000 mm 3200 mm