2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 2005 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2005 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Daewoo Rezzo (120 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 239 kg more than 2005 Daewoo Rezzo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Daewoo Rezzo. (176 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 2005 Daewoo Rezzo | |
Make | Chrysler | Daewoo |
Model | ESX 3 | Rezzo |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 176 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1381 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2610 mm |