2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 2005 Holden Jackaroo
To start off, 2005 Holden Jackaroo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Holden Jackaroo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Holden Jackaroo (213 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Holden Jackaroo should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Holden Jackaroo weights approximately 300 kg more than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Holden Jackaroo. (310 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Holden Jackaroo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 2005 Holden Jackaroo | |
| Make | Chrysler | Holden |
| Model | ESX 3 | Jackaroo |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 3494 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 213 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 332 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2770 mm |
