2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 2006 Nissan M
To start off, 2006 Nissan M is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Nissan M is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan M (462 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (332 Nm). This means 2006 Nissan M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 2006 Nissan M | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | ESX 3 | M |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 4500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 332 Nm | 462 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1830 mm |