2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 2008 Nissan Sentra

To start off, 2008 Nissan Sentra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Sentra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Sentra (140 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Sentra should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Sentra weights approximately 785 kg more than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Sentra. (199 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Sentra.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chrysler ESX 3 2008 Nissan Sentra
Make Chrysler Nissan
Model ESX 3 Sentra
Year Released 2000 2008
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1499 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 74 HP 140 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 5100 RPM
Torque 332 Nm 199 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1620 kg 2405 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4570 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase Size 3000 mm 2690 mm