2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 2008 Volkswagen GTI
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen GTI is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Volkswagen GTI is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volkswagen GTI (200 HP) has 126 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen GTI should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 284 kg more than 2008 Volkswagen GTI.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volkswagen GTI. (281 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volkswagen GTI.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 2008 Volkswagen GTI | |
Make | Chrysler | Volkswagen |
Model | ESX 3 | GTI |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 332 Nm | 281 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1336 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2580 mm |