2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 would be higher. At 1,964 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi TT (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3.
Because 2010 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi TT (350 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (332 Nm). This means 2010 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Chrysler | Audi |
Model | ESX 3 | TT |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2469 mm |