2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 2010 Ford E-250
To start off, 2010 Ford E-250 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-250 (265 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-250 weights approximately 230 kg more than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-250 (339 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (332 Nm). This means 2010 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | 2010 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | ESX 3 | E-250 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 339 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4717 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2824 mm |