2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover

To start off, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 would be higher. At 4,367 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover (311 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3.

Because 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover (700 Nm) has 368 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (332 Nm). This means 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chrysler ESX 3 2010 Land Rover Range Rover
Make Chrysler Land Rover
Model ESX 3 Range Rover
Year Released 2000 2010
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1499 cc 4367 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 74 HP 311 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 332 Nm 700 Nm
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4973 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 2035 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1877 mm
Wheelbase Size 3000 mm 2891 mm