2000 Chrysler ESX 3 vs. 2010 Mazda Tribute

To start off, 2010 Mazda Tribute is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 would be higher. At 2,483 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 495 kg more than 2010 Mazda Tribute.

Because 2010 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda Tribute. (184 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda Tribute.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chrysler ESX 3 2010 Mazda Tribute
Make Chrysler Mazda
Model ESX 3 Tribute
Year Released 2000 2010
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1499 cc 2483 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 74 HP 153 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 332 Nm 184 Nm
Drive Type Front 4WD
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1620 kg 1125 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4450 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1780 mm
Wheelbase Size 3000 mm 2630 mm